Sunday, July 1, 2012

WGEEP report is nobody's baby?

Is there a hidden message the government has conveyed by dropping Prof. Madhav Gadgil from the National Advisory Council (NAC)? Has persistent efforts by Gadgil to ensure that the report of the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (WGEEP), of which he has been the chairperson, be accepted by the Ministry of Environment & Forests been negatively construed by the government? It is seemingly clear that Gadgil's stance as an activist, to get the report accepted, hasn't gone well with the government.

Sources indicate that at this crucial juncture, with a close eye on the 2014 general elections, the government wants the NAC to work in close synergy with the UPA to provide a clutch of actions that can deliver political goodwill to keep the 'aam aadmi' image of the ruling coalition alive in popular perception. With Food Security Bill, Communal Violence Bill and the Land Acquisition Bill already mired in controversy, the NAC can least afford controversies and dissension on additional matters.

Insiders believe that the WGEEP report, despite public opinion been sought on it till July 5, would remain an exercise in ecological academics. If it could not be accepted when Gadgil was member of the NAC, the chances that anything dramatic may happen when he is no longer member of the august council seems remote. While the Western Ghats may not be politically volatile region, accepting WGEEP recommendations may have serious implications (with likely spillover to other regions) on the growth agenda of the government.  Jairam Ramesh, who was instrumental in setting up the panel, has already expressed his fears that the WGEEP report may get junked.   

2 comments:

  1. Outlook story on NAC (http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?281560)reflects the apparent 'hidden' reasons for the three members, including Madhav Gadgil, to be shown the door, something that was reflected in this short report a week earlier. The intention in comparing the two 'news' stories is not to claim who 'broke' the broken story first but to see through the new 'synergy' between NAC and PMO aimed at pushing the so-called 'reform agenda'. With the new finance minister in charge and the bugle of general elections already sounded, pushing 'environment' up on the political agenda as well as public psyche is a challenge that would warrant 'strategic thinking'. If writing on the wall is 'clear' than 'WGEEP' and 'Heritage Tag' may be two small flies in the big soup?

    ReplyDelete
  2. One couldn't imagine it to so quick. The WGEEP report is undoubtedly 'nobody's baby' as the Ministry has decided to constitute another panel to override the previous attempt.

    The Times of India (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-to-set-up-second-panel-to-rework-report-on-Western-Ghats/articleshow/14787022.cms) has reported on July 10, 2012 that the government has decided to set up another committee comprising central and state government experts to review the controversial report of the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (WGEEP) after several states vehemently objected to the recommendations.

    The decision was taken by environment and forests minister Jayanthi Natarajan in concurrence with the PMO. The committee will be required to submit its views on the report in two months.

    Sources in the environment ministry said more than 6,000 comments had been received on the WGEEP recommendations since the report was put in public domain asking for views.

    The WGEEP report had recommended banning mining in 60% of hill areas falling in six states over the next five years and not permitting any new mines in another 15% of the Western Ghats area - a globally recognized biodiversity rich zone.

    The panel, headed by Madhav Gadgil, who has also served on the Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council, had come up with a zoning plan for the region, recommending that the Ghats should be classified into three classes of eco-sensitive zone with various degrees of restriction on land use for development and agriculture. It had also pushed the case for setting up an authority to monitor implementation of the report and the management of the eco-sensitive zones.

    The panel's advice has sparked strong reactions from states such as Kerala, which claimed that complete implementation of the recommendations would lead to unprecedented restrictions on development and infrastructure growth.

    Sources in the environment ministry told TOI that the committee would be asked to take a holistic view on the ecologists' recommendations and bring on board the apprehensions of state governments as well as other central ministries as well. It is likely to be headed by an eminent environmental expert though the environment ministry has not yet shortlisted names.

    Natarajan's decision to set up a committee will also negate the attempts by the Planning Commission to intervene on behalf of the states, sidelining other stakeholders who had approached the environment ministry with their varying views. The report has had an unprecedented reaction from various quarters including civil society and industry with the economic development in more than 80 districts directly affected by the recommendations besides the large industrial stakes in the mine-rich zone.

    ReplyDelete