First, our 'art' was redrawn to suit to the minister's 'drawing room'. Perhaps not without reason, the fine lines of an 'authority' were converted into hard lines of a what was construed as a 'panel'. Second, an imaginative piece of work was converted into a 'process', with a definite timeline to deliver the end-product a'la WGEEP Report. Pinning hopes on the leftover of the original, the movement laughed and cried at each stage of the process (post 2010), missing out on the next possible opportunity to get back on the drawing board for its next 'creation'. Living in a state of strange schizophrenia the SWGM instead has been lost in the illusory notion of being close to achieving the unachievable!
Many may disagree but any 'movement' is 70 per cent work of 'art' and 30 per cent 'commerce'. Since the first work of 'art' was bought at Kotagiri, this ratio has been reversed. What was spontaneously unpredictable could now be predictably contrived - the movement has literally been swallowed by time-bound activities. What is not written in the project document is most unlikely to be considered, cause-effect linearity determines the logic of any 'action'. No wonder, it is a losing battle that the 'movement' is currently engaged in, if at all. Unless the current batch of 'proponents' go back on the drawing board, commerce-driven gainful engagement will ensure that the SWGM only celebrates its 'past', something to 'w(g)eep over!
The 'art' similie is good. Indeed, all movements are '70% work of art'. The rest are strategies, plans, mobilisation, advocacy etc. That also keeps things suited to local ethos.That it has been hijacked by Sh Jairam Ramesh and reduced to a mere panel with tacit consent of activists comes out as a needed hard blow. Comes out clearly that instead of moving on to its next 'painting' the activists stalled themselves and the potential in the movement.
ReplyDelete